Last May I posted the observation that governing is prediction.
Various studies have concluded that, in general, liberals are better prognosticators than conservatives, especially if they have no law degree.
Now David Frum of the Wall Street Journal has joined the chorus.
"Imagine, if you will," Frum asks, "someone who read only the Wall Street Journal editorial page between 2000 and 2011, and someone in the same period who read only the collected columns of Paul Krugman. Which reader would have been better informed about the realities of the current economic crisis? The answer, I think, should give us pause. Can it be that our enemies were right?"
The main problem I see with Frum's observation is the assumption that someone whose research and analysis of facts and trends differs from one's own is thereby an "enemy." We should all be seekers of truth, not seekers of vindication. The proof of the pudding is in the accuracy of resulting predictions.
Krugman's predictions are accurate. Wall Street Journal's are not.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Prediction and Governing
Topic Tags:
economics,
government,
philosophy,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment