Once again at last night's county commissioner meeting, one of the commissioners bragged that NC-20, the lobbying organization funded in part by taxpayers of the 20 coastal counties, had successfully persuaded the Coastal Resources Commission not to adopt the report of the CRC science committee forecasting a sea level rise of as much as one meter (39 inches) by 2100.
She explained that adopting the report might withdraw 1.3 million acres in Eastern North Carolina from future use. She also explained that it might raise insurance rates.
My problem with that is, I am about to raise my house 36 inches. Before doing so, I would like access to the best available scientific assessment of sea level rise. That extra three inches could be crucial, if not to me personally, at least to my heirs.
Is ignorance better than knowledge? I don't think so.
If we build on 1.3 million acres that shouldn't be developed, who pays the damages when the water rises? Is NC-20 going to pick up the tab?
I don't think so. The rest of us will.
Yesterday's New York Times printed a very illuminating article about sea level rise, hurricane damage and the outer banks. Read it here.
Whenever a significant hurricane hits the banks, it makes new channels across the islands, severing roads and destroying bridges.
One sensible suggestion by scientists (who keep telling us that the outer banks aren't stable) is to replace the bridges with ferries.
It would be cheaper and more reliable.
By the way, there is no bridge to Okracoke and the tourist industry there does just fine.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Water, Water Everywhere
Topic Tags:
boating,
climate,
economic development,
planning,
politics,
state government
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment