Remember the previous South Avenue Case? The Town spent tens of thousands of dollars to win clear control over the terminus of South Avenue.
TOWN OF ORIENTAL, Plaintiff,
v.
Lacy HENRY and wife, Judy
B. Henry, Defendants.
No. COA08–896.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
July 7, 2009.
Background: Town filed suit against purported owners of portion of street that was
never paved or used for vehicular traffic,
seeking to clear title to property. Defendants filed motion to dismiss for failure to
state a claim upon which relief can be
granted. Town filed motion for summary
judgment. The Superior Court, Pamlico
County, Kenneth F. Crow, J., denied
town’s motion, treated defendants’ motion
as one for summary judgment, and granted summary judgment to defendants.
Town appealed.
Holdings: The Court of Appeals, Stephens, J., held that:
(1) unpaved portion of street that was never paved or used for vehicular traffic
remained dedicated to public use;
(2) withdrawal of dedication of portion of
street that was never paved or used for
vehicular traffic by its former owner
was ineffective; and
(3) purported owners were not permitted
to acquire possession of the property
by adverse possession.
Reversed and remanded.
1. Appeal and Error O893(1)
Standard of review for summary judgment is de novo.
2. Dedication O19(5), 29, 31
Generally, where lots are sold and conveyed by reference to a map or plat which represents a division of a tract of land into subdivisions of streets and lots, such streets become dedicated to public use, and the purchaser of the lot or lots acquires the right to have each of the streets kept open; [There is more, but this is pertinent to Cox v. Town]
Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 2
May 2008 by Judge Kenneth F. Crow in
Pamlico County Superior Court. Heard in
the Court of Appeals 29 January 2009.
Wheatly, Wheatly, Weeks & Lupton, P.A.,by Stevenson L. Weeks, Beaufort, and Davis,Hartman, Wright, PLLC, by Michael ScottDavis, New Bern, for Plaintiff.Lee, Hancock & Lasitter, PA, by Moses D.Lasitter, and McAfee Law, P.A., by Robert
J. McAfee, New Bern, for Defendants.
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Town Of Oriental v. Lacy Henry (Highlights)
Topic Tags:
private property rights,
town government
Friday, March 27, 2015
Cox Surrenders to Town Government's Taking
This
is to let readers of my blog know that I have formally surrendered in the court
case of Cox v. Town of Oriental in what I still view as a swindle.
I call it a swindle because when Town Government closed the terminus of South Avenue, they took my personal property right (and the right of other property owners in the Village) to an easement in that street and gave it to another citizen. Not because I say so, but because more than a hundred years of NC Supreme Court decisions say so. The Court of Appeals spelled it out in the second paragraph of their 2009 opinion in the case of Town of Oriental v. Henry: "Generally," the Court said, "where lots are sold and conveyed by reference to a map or plat which represents a division of a tract of land into subdivisions of streets and lots, such streets become dedicated to public use, and the purchaser of the lot or lots acquires the right to have each of the streets kept open...."
I didn't surrender because the Town had the right to close South Avenue - they didn't. I surrendered because I no longer have the material and emotional resources to continue the fight, even though the prospects for a win at the Court of Appeals were excellent. But I had to face the possibility that even after a win I might face additional years of litigation.
I call it a swindle because when Town Government closed the terminus of South Avenue, they took my personal property right (and the right of other property owners in the Village) to an easement in that street and gave it to another citizen. Not because I say so, but because more than a hundred years of NC Supreme Court decisions say so. The Court of Appeals spelled it out in the second paragraph of their 2009 opinion in the case of Town of Oriental v. Henry: "Generally," the Court said, "where lots are sold and conveyed by reference to a map or plat which represents a division of a tract of land into subdivisions of streets and lots, such streets become dedicated to public use, and the purchaser of the lot or lots acquires the right to have each of the streets kept open...."
I didn't surrender because the Town had the right to close South Avenue - they didn't. I surrendered because I no longer have the material and emotional resources to continue the fight, even though the prospects for a win at the Court of Appeals were excellent. But I had to face the possibility that even after a win I might face additional years of litigation.
I'm sorry the elected officials of the Town spent so much money on the effort to keep the legal issues from being ruled on by the Court of Appeals. I'm sorry the Town Government has done nothing to protect future public access to and ownership rights of the new Town Dock, as I urged them repeatedly to do.
From 2002 to 2009 the
Town Government spent tens of thousands of dollars to defend its
control of South Avenue and to defend the rights of its citizens to use that public way to access public trust waters. That effort sought to bring legal issues before the Court of Appeals. Now
the Commissioners claim to have spent more than 80 thousand to abandon the fruits of
that victory for the Town's citizens and property owners. This time the Town Government's purpose in the court fight was to keep the issues away from the Court of Appeals.
I
am grateful to the Court of Appeals for spelling out in its opinion on
Avenue A what I needed to do to win on South Avenue. I am also
grateful to the Court that it did not affirm a single one of the Town's
claims to have lawful authority to do what they did.
That
being said, I could easily foresee two or three more years of effort to oppose this taking,
with an uncertain outcome. I have other things to do.
I have abandoned the court fight, but I will not abandon my concern for public access to public trust waters.
Thanks for your support.
David Cox
Topic Tags:
law,
private property rights,
town government
Friday, March 20, 2015
Town of Oriental Press Release
Readers of The Pamlico News will know about the lengthy screed published on the front page of Wednesday's edition. The lead in paragraph described the screed as the "settlement agreement" between the Town and me.
It is not.
The document, described as a "Press Release," was forwarded to local press by Town Hall, with the following message:
"From: Town Manager <Manager@townoforiental.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:42 PM
Subject: PRESS RELEASE
To: editor@thepamliconews.com, Jeff@compassnews360.com, Charlie Hall <charlie.hall@newbernsj.com>, Town Dock <info@towndock.net>
David Cox Comment: The Town's "Press Release" is quoted below. I have been told by a usually reliable source who wrote the document, but until the author has the fortitude to sign it, I prefer to call the author "anonymous" or "concealed."
David Cox Comment:
I urge any member of the public having questions about the document to follow the instructions and call Mayor Bill Sage.
It is not.
The document, described as a "Press Release," was forwarded to local press by Town Hall, with the following message:
"From: Town Manager <Manager@townoforiental.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:42 PM
Subject: PRESS RELEASE
To: editor@thepamliconews.com, Jeff@compassnews360.com, Charlie Hall <charlie.hall@newbernsj.com>, Town Dock <info@towndock.net>
Good Afternoon,
Please see attached Press Release. Any further comment from the Town can be solicited from Mayor Bill Sage at 252-670-8227.
David Cox Comment: The Town's "Press Release" is quoted below. I have been told by a usually reliable source who wrote the document, but until the author has the fortitude to sign it, I prefer to call the author "anonymous" or "concealed."
PRESS
RELEASE
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE—March 17, 2015—Oriental, NC
To
paraphrase Gerald Ford, “Our long David Cox nightmare is over.”
A full release including a dismissal with prejudice of all lawsuits
and appeals filed against the Town by Oriental resident David Cox has
been executed by Cox and Oriental Mayor Bill Sage on behalf of the
Town. The long and expensive ordeal began when Cox challenged the
Town’s authority under state statutes to close the street
rights-of-way at South Avenue’s western terminus at Raccoon Creek
and all of Avenue A. Cox filed a lawsuit in August 2012 objecting to
the Town’s closing of Avenue A, which was done by order of the
Board of Commissioners after a public hearing in July 2012. After a
hearing in Pamlico County Superior, Senior Resident Superior Court
Judge Benjamin Alford, on April 6, 2013, dismissed all counts of the
complaint filed by Cox . Cox had represented himself, pro
se,
in the court hearing. Cox then obtained an attorney who filed an
appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals from Judge Alford’s
order dismissing the case.
After
the dismissal of the lawsuit, the Town entered an order to close the
western end of South Avenue to the waters of Raccoon Creek. The
order announced the intention of the Board to dedicate the property
as a park providing public access to Raccoon Creek and public
amenities to be constructed thereon. Picnic tables were purchased
and placed on the property as part of the process of making it a
first-class amenity for the Town citizens and visitors alike.
Notwithstanding
that his case had been dismissed and an appeal filed, Cox (again
acting pro
se)
filed a second lawsuit against the Town for the closing of a portion
of South Avenue. This meant that the Town had to pay its attorneys
not only for successfully obtaining dismissal of the first suit and
to fully brief the issues to the Court of appeals, but now also to
start the process again on the second lawsuit. The Town’s legal
bills began mounting to tens of thousands of dollars. The Town filed
motions similar to the earlier motions in the first case to dismiss
the second and for sanctions against Cox for filing the second suit.
Superior Court Judge John Nobles entered a stay of the second action
pending the outcome of the appeal, on the grounds that the appeal
would likely resolve the second case.
On
the first of July 2014, the Court of Appeals filed its opinion and
order affirming Judge Alford’s order dismissing the first lawsuit.
The opinion found that Cox had no standing to bring the first suit.
By this point, the Town had spent more than $60000 on the Cox
lawsuits and the Town’s attorneys invited Cox to dismiss his second
action in light of the Court of Appeals’ decision, to end the farce
once and for all, warning Cox that sanctions would be pursued if he
refused. Cox refused to take a dismissal and, therefore, the Town
was obliged to file yet another exhaustive brief to the Superior
Court and to renew its formal motions to dismiss. Judge Alford held
a hearing on November 24, 2014 on the motions and subsequently issued
his order dismissing all of the second lawsuit, another complete
victory for the Town, but at considerable additional cost. Cox then
did the unimaginable. He filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals of
Judge Alford’s order dismissing the second case.
Judge
Alford had indicated that the Town’s motion for sanctions was still
ripe and that he would hear a motion if the Town pressed it. Further
talks between the Town attorneys and Cox ensued and as deadlines at
the Court of Appeals approached and passed, Cox finally agreed to
dismiss the appeal and all matters and suits against the Town. The
Town merely agreed not to pursue sanctions any further. The release
and dismissal was signed and will be submitted to the Court this
week. The total cost to the Town of Oriental of David Cox’s
actions is likely to be in excess of $80000.
During
this expensive and lengthy process, the Town proceeded with
completing the partially built dock on the property obtained from Mr.
Fulcher. We now enjoy a beautiful new eighty-foot public dock for
visiting boaters to The Sailing Capital of North Carolina. In
addition, the Town applied for and has been awarded grants for the
construction of a public restroom facility on the property and for
acquisition and placement on the property of a waste pumpout station
for vessels visiting the new Town Dock Number Two. Plans are
approved and construction is proceeding. The old historic boathouse
on the property is to be fully renovated into a Visitors Center,
adding yet another much needed amenity to the Town assets for
visiting boaters and other tourists.
The
Town Board of Commissioners and the Manager and her staff are about
to enter the budget process for the next fiscal year. But for Mr.
Cox and his lawsuits and appeals, there would be many more dollars
available for Oriental to use in providing facilities and services to
its citizens and visitors."
Diane H. Miller
Town Manager
Town of Oriental, NC
507 Church St PO Box 472
Oriental, NC 28571
Ph: 252.249.0555
Pursuant
to NC General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic
mail message and any attachments hereto, as well as electronic mail
message(s) that may be sent in response to it may be considered a public
record and as such are subject to request and review by anyone at any
time."David Cox Comment:
I urge any member of the public having questions about the document to follow the instructions and call Mayor Bill Sage.
Topic Tags:
town government
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Good For David Boren
David Boren, President of the University oF Oklahoma, has a moral compass.
He also knows how to take decisive action. Would that more of our leaders take heed.
David Boren is not a household name in most of the country. In fact, no University President anywhere across our land is likely to be as well known as the football or basketball coach. Nobel laureates on the faculty? Who cares!
David Boren is unusual. Former governor of the state of Oklahoma, former senator from Oklahoma, he resigned his senate seat to accept the position as President of OU. In his campaign for Oklahoma governor, he defeated James Inhofe. Boren was a Rhodes Scholar.
As for decisive action, he has expelled two members of SAE who were ringleaders in the racist chant, closed the SAE fraternity and forced them to move out of their building on campus.
"Sooners aren't bigots," he announced.
He also knows how to take decisive action. Would that more of our leaders take heed.
David Boren is not a household name in most of the country. In fact, no University President anywhere across our land is likely to be as well known as the football or basketball coach. Nobel laureates on the faculty? Who cares!
David Boren is unusual. Former governor of the state of Oklahoma, former senator from Oklahoma, he resigned his senate seat to accept the position as President of OU. In his campaign for Oklahoma governor, he defeated James Inhofe. Boren was a Rhodes Scholar.
As for decisive action, he has expelled two members of SAE who were ringleaders in the racist chant, closed the SAE fraternity and forced them to move out of their building on campus.
"Sooners aren't bigots," he announced.
Topic Tags:
education
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
47 Senators Violate Logan Act
Is there something significant about the number 47? That's the same number Mitt Romney used to describe the percentage of Americans who weren't going to vote for him. Just sayin'.
Those curious about US law may have learned that the 47 Republican senators signing the letter to officials of Iran appear to have violated the Logan Act and be subject to 3 years in prison.
So who was Logan and why was the Act passed? Here's a good summary of the history of the Act. And it is a long history.
In 1798 a certain American citizen named Logan travelled to France and worked to improve US - French relations and to free Americans captured by France during the Quasi-War. Logan was a follower of Thomas Jefferson (of the Democratic-Republican party). President Adams, of the Federalist Party, was outraged. This was not just about Constitutional prerogatives - Adams sought improved relations with Great Britain while Jefferson sought improved relations with France.
So much for the idea that "politics stops at the water's edge."
It never did.
In more than two centuries, there has never been a prosecution under the Logan Act, though there have been some close calls.
Those curious about US law may have learned that the 47 Republican senators signing the letter to officials of Iran appear to have violated the Logan Act and be subject to 3 years in prison.
So who was Logan and why was the Act passed? Here's a good summary of the history of the Act. And it is a long history.
In 1798 a certain American citizen named Logan travelled to France and worked to improve US - French relations and to free Americans captured by France during the Quasi-War. Logan was a follower of Thomas Jefferson (of the Democratic-Republican party). President Adams, of the Federalist Party, was outraged. This was not just about Constitutional prerogatives - Adams sought improved relations with Great Britain while Jefferson sought improved relations with France.
So much for the idea that "politics stops at the water's edge."
It never did.
In more than two centuries, there has never been a prosecution under the Logan Act, though there have been some close calls.
Topic Tags:
diplomatic,
Europe,
history,
international
Monday, March 9, 2015
Powerful Words
In yesterday' Atlantic, James Fallows pays tribute to President Obama's words on the Pettus Bridge at Selma.
None of us can add to the President's eloquence and wisdom, but Fallows helps us fit the passages into our own hopes and dreams: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/finally-i-hear-a-politician-explain-my-country-the-way-i-understand-it/387178/
There were, in the President's words, echoes of Lincoln. And of Jefferson - and of those who cobbled together a rickety Constitution to hold together a great nation whose citizens often didn't like each other much. But no matter.
We can overcome our divisions and do great things together - and have done so, on occasion.
We are not perfect - or even close, but we can become more perfect if we so choose.
I was also reminded in the President's words of the voice and vision of a great poet who celebrated
"the American muse, whose strong and diverse heart
So many men have tried to understand
But only made it smaller with their art,
Because you are as various as your land,"
Don't take my word for it, read John Vincent Benet's epic poem John Brown's Body for yourself:
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks07/0700461.txt
None of us can add to the President's eloquence and wisdom, but Fallows helps us fit the passages into our own hopes and dreams: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/finally-i-hear-a-politician-explain-my-country-the-way-i-understand-it/387178/
There were, in the President's words, echoes of Lincoln. And of Jefferson - and of those who cobbled together a rickety Constitution to hold together a great nation whose citizens often didn't like each other much. But no matter.
We can overcome our divisions and do great things together - and have done so, on occasion.
We are not perfect - or even close, but we can become more perfect if we so choose.
I was also reminded in the President's words of the voice and vision of a great poet who celebrated
"the American muse, whose strong and diverse heart
So many men have tried to understand
But only made it smaller with their art,
Because you are as various as your land,"
Don't take my word for it, read John Vincent Benet's epic poem John Brown's Body for yourself:
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks07/0700461.txt
Saturday, March 7, 2015
Yankee Station And Selma
Fifty years ago, my ship was boring holes in the South China Sea, firing projectiles into the jungles of South Vietnam at targets we couldn't see - some nine miles away. It was hard and challenging work and our sailors did it well, but in the end it had little effect.
Meanwhile, brave Americans marched to Selma, stood up for freedom in Greensboro, marched in Memphis, and changed America for the better. These were real patriots and I salute them.
And so did President Obama: http://www.vox.com/2015/3/7/8168085/president-obama-selma-50
Meanwhile, brave Americans marched to Selma, stood up for freedom in Greensboro, marched in Memphis, and changed America for the better. These were real patriots and I salute them.
And so did President Obama: http://www.vox.com/2015/3/7/8168085/president-obama-selma-50
Topic Tags:
elections,
government,
history,
law,
leadership,
navy,
war
Monday, March 2, 2015
Nemtsov Memorial March
I was glad to see photos of crowds marching in Moscow in honor of Boris Nemtsov.
This march really took more courage than the "Je suis Charlie" demonstrations in France. Supporters of Nemtsov could be in real danger from the Russian state.
Good for them.
This march really took more courage than the "Je suis Charlie" demonstrations in France. Supporters of Nemtsov could be in real danger from the Russian state.
Good for them.
Topic Tags:
Russia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)