While marines and supporting Navy forces were on their way to Guadalcanal in early August 1942, the 27th Air Depot Group was finishing its period of Preparing for Overseas Movement (POM) in Mobile, Alabama.
The Air Depot Group was a new organizational concept, planned to provide fourth echelon (whatever that means) services to air combat forces near forward areas. The concept of having air depot groups in the forward area was new. So new that the table of organization (T/O) was not issued until June, 1942. Efforts to organize for going overseas couldn't be completed until the T/O was available.
Here is a standard organizational chart an Air Depot Group issued June 15, 1942.
By early August, 1942, the 27th Air Depot Group was substantially organized in Mobile, Alabama. By mid-month the group and all of its equipment was staged for shipping by train to San Francisco.
My father, then a Tech Sgt. in the US Army Air Forces, was among the officers, non-commissioned officers and enlisted men who left Mobile in mid-August. Destination: the South Pacific.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Gabby
So why am I keeping my eyes open as midnight approaches, to see which remarkably talented young woman wins the all around gold medal in gymnastics?
I don't know.
I enjoyed seeing Gabby Douglas win.
But the silver and bronze medalists and the others who competed were all pretty amazing.
Gabby is a winner!
But the truth is, there isn't a loser among them.
Three cheers for the whole bunch.
I don't know.
I enjoyed seeing Gabby Douglas win.
But the silver and bronze medalists and the others who competed were all pretty amazing.
Gabby is a winner!
But the truth is, there isn't a loser among them.
Three cheers for the whole bunch.
Topic Tags:
sports
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Seventy Years Ago: Operation Watchtower
At a time before public relations operatives were allowed to name military operations, code names were intended to conceal the purpose being undertaken.
In June of 1942, the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff created a new command, the South Pacific Theater, commanded by Vice Admiral Robert V. Ghormley. Objective: offensive operations against Japanese forces in the Solomons. Code name: Operation Watchtower.
Seventy-five warships and transports gathered near Fiji on July 26, held one rehearsal landing, and departed July 31 for the objective area.
Targets: Florida Island, Tulagi and Guadalcanal. Officer in Tactical Command: Vice Admiral Frank Jack Fletcher, embarked in USS Saratoga (CV-3); Amphibious Force Commander: Rear Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner; Commander of the Landing Force: Major General (Marines) Alexander Vandegrift.
D-day: August 7, 1942.
In June of 1942, the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff created a new command, the South Pacific Theater, commanded by Vice Admiral Robert V. Ghormley. Objective: offensive operations against Japanese forces in the Solomons. Code name: Operation Watchtower.
Seventy-five warships and transports gathered near Fiji on July 26, held one rehearsal landing, and departed July 31 for the objective area.
Targets: Florida Island, Tulagi and Guadalcanal. Officer in Tactical Command: Vice Admiral Frank Jack Fletcher, embarked in USS Saratoga (CV-3); Amphibious Force Commander: Rear Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner; Commander of the Landing Force: Major General (Marines) Alexander Vandegrift.
D-day: August 7, 1942.
London, 1939
One benefit of Olympic coverage is that we sometimes learn a bit of illuminating history. I put the 1939 British slogan "Keep Calm and Carry On" in that category. What a useful evocation of an earlier time!
A good thing to remember from a time when national survival was really at stake.
We need no hysteria. Just get on with it!
A good thing to remember from a time when national survival was really at stake.
We need no hysteria. Just get on with it!
Topic Tags:
history
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Fifty-Four Years
A personal note: Fifty-Four Years ago today, Elizabeth and I were married in California. I was in the navy, and it was during the Quemoy-Matsu crisis. I couldn't go on leave to Texas, so she came to California.
We have had many adventures since then, but it seems like yesterday.
We have had many adventures since then, but it seems like yesterday.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Raising The House
A new tropical wave appeared today off the coast of Africa. Designated Invest 99, the new wave has the potential of developing into a tropical depression.
Which serves to remind us that it was about eleven months ago when Hurricane Irene descended upon Oriental, bringing the highest storm surge in recent memory. Some of us have not yet completed repairs and mitigation measures.
This afternoon a contractor elevated our house high enough to escape likely storm surges for the future. At least if sea level rises no more than a foot or two.
Which serves to remind us that it was about eleven months ago when Hurricane Irene descended upon Oriental, bringing the highest storm surge in recent memory. Some of us have not yet completed repairs and mitigation measures.
This afternoon a contractor elevated our house high enough to escape likely storm surges for the future. At least if sea level rises no more than a foot or two.
Topic Tags:
weather
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Let's Fix The Deficit?
Headline in today's Los Angeles Times tells you all you need to know about the so-called deficit problem:
Is it that the debate over when and how to cure the federal deficit has reached new heights of cartoonish inanity? That we are now being treated to finger-wagging about the need to get our fiscal house in order by corporate CEOs like JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon (trading loss $5.8 billion and counting, potential cost to ratepayers from alleged manipulation of the California electricity market $200 million and counting).
Or is it that the remedies for the deficit always seem to involve cutting taxes for the top 1% of U.S. income earners while cutting Social Security retirement benefits (average monthly check: $1,230) for everyone else?"
As I have said before, the real question in politics is, "who benefits and who pays?"
For the past four decades, the answer has been that the top 1% benefits and the rest of us pay. Time to wake up.
Deficit debate driven by the wealthy
The Simpson/Bowles plan bills itself as a road map to deficit reduction, but it's really a guide to cutting services and benefits for the working and middle class while protecting the interests of the wealthy.
I like the opening paragraph of the article by Michael Hiltzik, as well:
"There must be a reason that every time I hear the term "fiscal cliff," the image that comes to mind is of Wile E. Coyote pumping his feet in midair just before plunging into the valley below.
Is it that the debate over when and how to cure the federal deficit has reached new heights of cartoonish inanity? That we are now being treated to finger-wagging about the need to get our fiscal house in order by corporate CEOs like JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon (trading loss $5.8 billion and counting, potential cost to ratepayers from alleged manipulation of the California electricity market $200 million and counting).
Or is it that the remedies for the deficit always seem to involve cutting taxes for the top 1% of U.S. income earners while cutting Social Security retirement benefits (average monthly check: $1,230) for everyone else?"
As I have said before, the real question in politics is, "who benefits and who pays?"
For the past four decades, the answer has been that the top 1% benefits and the rest of us pay. Time to wake up.
Killing Oriental's Golden Egg Goose
I've been listening to a recording of the Town's public hearing of July 3rd concerning closure of streets and the related contract between the Town and Chris Fulcher. Very confusing.
There were some interesting passages during the discussion. At one point, Commissioner Summers observed:
What I believe Commissioner Summers is talking about is the Town Board's decision, several years ago, to abandon the public's riparian interests in a very attractive anchorage area that enticed many boaters to visit the Town, and to cede the area to use by the private developers of Oriental Harbor Marina.
The Town let marina developers steal the public's riparian waters, which the Town is supposed to protect in trust for the public.
Under normal riparian rules, the boundary between the public waters extending from the terminus of the South Water Street public right-or-way (ROW) and those of the marina developers is a line running at right angles to the center-line of the channel.
The developers plat below, however, shows the southerly limit of the marina's riparian rights as running along a line extended from the northern edge of South Water Street out into the harbor. On the plat this line it is labeled as "Riparian Line / Extension of Water Street Right of Way" - it is hard to read, so I have drawn a red dash-dot line over it, labelled "Extension of limit of Water St. ROW."
The Town Board either did not understand, or did not care, or (even worse) did care, that the Riparian border line platted by the developers was incorrect and bit heavily into the remaining riparian area extending from the public trust ROW.
About twenty of Oriental Harbor Marina's slips are actually within the public's riparian waters extending from the South Water Street terminus. About five more slips are within the "15' buffer zone," from which the Town could have excluded marina construction had the Town been willing to assert the public's riparian rights.
This was outright theft by the developers, aided and abetted by the collusion or gross negligence of the Town Board.
It is what can happen if the Town's citizens don't pay careful attention to how the Town Board manages public trust assets.
Who is protecting the public?
Here is the un-retouched detail (except for my pencil-marks) :
There were some interesting passages during the discussion. At one point, Commissioner Summers observed:
“Grace Evans brought up something that I think is really important here. One of the reasons we have a problem now, with our anchorage, is because of the five acres that was sent out there with Oriental Harbor Marina… We have killed the goose that laid the golden egg for Oriental… That’s what we did and I absolutely believe that."
What I believe Commissioner Summers is talking about is the Town Board's decision, several years ago, to abandon the public's riparian interests in a very attractive anchorage area that enticed many boaters to visit the Town, and to cede the area to use by the private developers of Oriental Harbor Marina.
The Town let marina developers steal the public's riparian waters, which the Town is supposed to protect in trust for the public.
Under normal riparian rules, the boundary between the public waters extending from the terminus of the South Water Street public right-or-way (ROW) and those of the marina developers is a line running at right angles to the center-line of the channel.
The developers plat below, however, shows the southerly limit of the marina's riparian rights as running along a line extended from the northern edge of South Water Street out into the harbor. On the plat this line it is labeled as "Riparian Line / Extension of Water Street Right of Way" - it is hard to read, so I have drawn a red dash-dot line over it, labelled "Extension of limit of Water St. ROW."
The Town Board either did not understand, or did not care, or (even worse) did care, that the Riparian border line platted by the developers was incorrect and bit heavily into the remaining riparian area extending from the public trust ROW.
About twenty of Oriental Harbor Marina's slips are actually within the public's riparian waters extending from the South Water Street terminus. About five more slips are within the "15' buffer zone," from which the Town could have excluded marina construction had the Town been willing to assert the public's riparian rights.
This was outright theft by the developers, aided and abetted by the collusion or gross negligence of the Town Board.
It is what can happen if the Town's citizens don't pay careful attention to how the Town Board manages public trust assets.
Who is protecting the public?
(Click on Map for Larger View)
Here is the un-retouched detail (except for my pencil-marks) :
(Click on plat for larger view)
Topic Tags:
history,
town government,
water access
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)