Some years ago, then-First Lady Hillary Clinton asserted that a "vast, right-wing conspiracy" had targeted her husband, President Bill Clinton.
In today's New York Times, columnist Timothy Egan stimulated a better word: "Cabal." I like "cabal" for the purpose. Cabals don't have to be vast in order to be effective.
Wikipedia explains: "A cabal is a group of people united in some close design together, usually to promote their private views or interests in a church, state, or other community, often by intrigue." Wikipedia elaborates: "The term can also be used to refer to the designs of such persons or to
the practical consequences of their emergent behavior, and also holds a
general meaning of intrigue and conspiracy.
The use of this term usually carries strong connotations of shadowy
corners, back rooms and insidious influence; a cabal is more evil and
selective than, say, a faction,
which is simply selfish; because of this negative connotation, few
organizations use the term to refer to themselves or their internal
subdivisions."
Egan didn't use the word "cabal" in his column. Instead, he referred to "a knot of Tea Party extremists who will never consider a fresh idea and a
House Speaker whose notion of compromise is to tell his Democratic
counterpart in the Senate to commit an unprintable act. For John
Boehner, his profane shout-out to Harry Reid passed for a New Year’s
toast." It was one of Egan's readers who suggested that "cabal" is a better word than "knot" for the phenomenon.
I agree with the reader. For many years now, a small group of extremely wealthy individuals, most of whom got their money the old-fashioned way (they inherited it) and who don't actually make anything but deals, have put their extreme wealth on the scales to change the rules that served the country well until the early seventies.
These are people who show nothing but disdain for Americans who actually work for a living. And they have proven adept at using intrigue to take resources from workers to line their own pockets.
That's the real story behind the "giant sucking sound" candidate Ross Perot talked about twenty years ago. Not the giant sucking sound of jobs fleeing to Mexico but of capital and jobs fleeing to China and India.
How can American workers (of all different-colored collars) counter this trend?
Get smart! Vote for jobs.
When everyone is back to work, get control over the banks and other financial institutions.
Uncloak the cabal.
Friday, January 4, 2013
On Cabals
Topic Tags:
economics,
government,
international,
management
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment