Much current commentary tends to describe the Tea Party phenomenon as just a bit more extreme than mainstream Republicanism, but within the American tradition. Francis Fukuyama recently tied the Tea Party efforts to the parts of the US Constitution that make it hard for anything to get done.
Michael Lind thinks it is more than that. It may have roots going back to Jefferson and Jackson (and to the Anti-Federalists, but Lind doesn't bring that up), but it represents a fundamentally anti-democratic undertaking. Think Downton Abbey.
Here is Lind's article. It is the best analysis I have read lately, putting it in the context of the American Civil War, the failure of reconstruction, and the reaction to the Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act.
There are a lot of different ways to look at current American politics. The different angles overlap, and they all seem to involve race to some degree.
I strongly recommend reading Lind's article.
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Tea Party Radicalism: Just A Bit More Extreme?
Topic Tags:
economics,
government,
law,
philosophy,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment