I have from time to time offered the view that in understanding political controversies, it is helpful to seek the answer to two questions: who benefits? and who pays?
Today I came across a review of a book by political scientists who have studied and sought to explain polarization. Political scientists Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal present their findings in Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (Walras-Pareto Lectures).
The review summarizes their findings: "[The authors] succeed in cutting through the seemingly crazed rhetoric of
conservative extremists in and out of Congress and reveal what it's
really all about: protecting the economic interests of the wealthy....
"What is really interesting about this analysis is that it implies that
the sizzling rhetoric coming from the right -- personal attacks on the
President, anti-gay rants, renewed heat around abortion and
contraception -- is just window dressing. By the evidence of voting
records, what the right really cares about is economic issues favoring
the affluent -- tax cuts, reduced social spending, reduced regulation of
business activity, and estate taxes. This isn't to say that the enraged
cultural commentators aren't sincere about their personal belief -- who
knows? But the policies of their party are very consistent, in the
analysis offered here. Maybe the best way of understanding the extremist
pundits is as a class of well-paid entertainers, riffing on themes of
hatred and cultural fundamentalism that have nothing to do with the real
goals of their party."
Who benefits? Who pays?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment