Oddities: 1

Among recent oddities at Town Hall that no one reported in the media was the curious exchange at the January 5 Town Board meeting over minutes.

The usual agenda sequence is that just after the pledge of allegiance, the Town Board adopts minutes of the previous regular meeting of the Town Board as well as of both closed and open sessions that may have been held in the interim. This is usually the least interesting or controversial part of the meeting. Occasionally one of the board members will propose an amendment to the minutes, and if there is any disagreement among members, it is quickly resolved and the minutes approved.

This time, as best I could tell from the back row, the board objected to both the form and content of closed session and open session minutes prepared by the recording secretary. Apparently the board had provided direction to the recording secretary at the agenda meeting. It seems that, instead of simply removing the text board members wanted removed, she used word processing software to line through the passages. When members of the board objected, she informed them that she "stands by" the version she prepared. Then she argued with the mayor over the facts.

It is worth noting that North Carolina General Statutes do not require minutes to be verbatim. If they did, the attic of Town Hall (where old records are stored) might have collapsed from the weight. The recording secretary is also not in the position of a court reporter. The minutes are under complete control of the Town Board.

Following a heated argument between the recording secretary, town commissioners and the mayor, the board once again directed the recording secretary to remove certain passages from the minutes. Then when the vote was held, Commissioner Venturi voted "no."

I have personally never seen an Oriental commissioner vote against adopting minutes. I have asked long time residents, including former commissioners and none of them recalls it ever happening before.

That's odd behavior.

The Water Board finally Meets

The most positive development to come out of the January meeting of Oriental's Town Board is that the water board has finally been convened. See my earlier thoughts on this subject.

Commissioner Johnson is apparently determined to establish terms of reference for the water board similar to those governing other advisory boards. This will be a good thing.

I hope the water board is able to investigate where the town's missing water is going. I have known about the unexplained disappearance of water for some time. Heidi Artley told me about the problem and offered a few possible explanations, each of which calls for investigation. I'm not convinced that backwashing pipes and dumping tanks provides an adequate explanation.

With respect to dumping tanks, I was repeatedly told by the previous town manager that the water in the towers is just there for storage and is not, by design, included in the circulation. Therefore the water loses its treatment and has to be dumped after awhile. I recently learned from the County's engineer that when this happens, as in the case of the County's Kershaw Road tank, it indicates an imbalance in the system. They plan to correct the Kershaw Road problem when they install the new water tank at Arapaho. Maybe we should have a new engineer check out our system.

Funny Stuff

There's some funny (odd) stuff going on at Town Hall lately. The most interesting oddities seem to be completely ignored by our local investigative reporters. Wonder why?

Who Does the Auditor Work for?

So much nonsense has been uttered about Oriental's audit, I thought I'd try to clear the air
for the benefit of those few who read my blog.

The auditor works for the Town Board of Commissioners. He does not work for the town manager. The audit is, in effect, a report to the Town Board on the town's financial health and the effectiveness of its procedures. It needs to be thorough, for the benefit of the town.

During the last town board I pressed to replace our former auditor. The board voted unanimously to make the change.

I can't speak for the others, but here are my reasons:

1. Other elected officials in Eastern North Carolina advised that it is good practice to replace the auditor every three to five years;
2. Our former auditor had not noticed that our occupancy tax should be categorized as a restricted fund like Powell Bill funds, to be used only for specific purposes and therefore not to be counted as part of the town's unrestricted reserve fund;
3. Our auditor did not notice that the administrative fee the town charged the water fund had not been recalculated since 2001 and therefore the taxpayers were subsidizing water rate payers about $35,000 per year;
4. Our auditor did not noticed that the tourism board expenditures of occupancy tax funds were not being accounted for in our accounting software, but kept on a separate sheet of paper;
5. Our auditor didn't notice that the tourism board was "rolling over" funds from one budget year to the next;
6. Our auditor either did not notice or did not object to having a large "miscellaneous" line item in each department's budget, contibuting to sloppy bookkeeping and lack of budget discipline;
7. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, the auditor provided the town on February 17, 2009 a list of 8 "Adjusting Journal Entries" for the Water Fund including 21 line items, totaling $241,330.44 with a net income effect of $81,273.36. Among the adjustments was one that increased net income by 3,503.48, labeled "Adjust cash to reconcile balance;"
8. On the same date the auditor provided 15 Adjusting Journal Entries for the Oriental General Fund consisting of 55 line items totaling $258,470.77, with a net income effect of $42,107.43;
9. The town received two complaints from the Local Government Commission about the lateness of the 2008 audit.

An audit should have addressed all of these problems.

When the auditor finally made his report of the 2008 audit to the Town Board in August 2009, more than a year after the end of the fiscal year that it covered, he made no mention of the Adjusting Journal Entries nor did he offer an explanation. Neither did he mention or explain the letter he received from the Local Government Commission directing him to make two changes before they would approve his final invoice and ordering three other less urgent corrections to the town's procedures.

I am not an accountant and can't say whether the AJE's complied with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices, but they looked a lot like gun decking to me. (See earlier post).

In late summer of 2008, our town manager at the time assured the Town Board that he had looked, and concluded that our existing firm of Seiler, Zachman & Associates offered the best deal available, even though they had just increased their fee by $3,000. He recommended we continue with them, and the Board approved his recommendation.

There seemed no reason at the time to question that judgment. By the summer of 2009, however, I was convinced that changing auditors was a matter of urgency.

I asked the new town manager to investigate whether it would be possible to retain a new auditor in time for him to audit our books for 2008 - 2009. He consulted a number of experienced people for recommendations, including a CPA who formerly resided in Oriental and served on the Town Board. He contacted three or four recommended firms and found that Pittard, Perry & Crone would agree to do the job in a timely fashion at a lower price than Seiler, Zachman & Associates (now Seiler, Singleton) had been charging. One of the attractive features of the service provided is that the Pittard, Perry & Crone auditor, Chris Burton, planned to come to Oriental to perform the audit, rather than perform it remotely as Seiler, Singleton did. The procedure for previous audits was that then town manager Wyatt Cutler personally delivered the town's documents to Mr. Singleton's office in Little Washington. A few years ago one of the town commissioners asked Mr. Cutler "you mean the auditor doesn't come here?" Mr. Cutler replied that wasn't necessary.

When I learned that we would be able to change auditors, Candy Bohmert and I called a special meeting. The town manager briefed the board, and Commissioner Styron moved that we hire Pittard, Perry & Crone. I think that unanimous decision was the right one.

Gundecking

One of the earliest skills I learned in the navy was "gundecking." That was the practice of running off to a quiet secluded compartment and making up records ("logs") just before an inspection. These were invariably logs that were supposed to be maintained on a real time basis, but that had been overlooked. It was a kind of petty dishonesty. Sometimes more than petty.

There was an art to gundecking. Those unskilled in the art would have one person make the entries and use the same pencil or pen. Those more skilled would change the writing instrument from time to time and leave a smudge or two on the log book. Gundecking would seem more plausible if the entries were made in at least three different hands.

Sailors (and officers) who gundecked records always had ample justification. Records hadn't been kept in real time because they had more urgent tasks. Doing the job was more important than all that pesky paperwork. The ship had to be painted. The guns had to be fired. Collecting empty brass and accounting for it was an annoyance. Besides, with fifty or a hundred pounds of brass, you could have the whole ship painted in Hong Kong. Surely that was more important. The crew was too small for all that paperwork, anyhow.

So usage data wasn't accurate and the Supply Officer didn't know what to order. We could make up the difference with cumshaw. What does cumshaw mean? Watch "Operation Petticoat."

Audit: Scheduled Presentation

Oriental's new auditor will present the audit to the Town Board at Tuesday's public meeting.

This appears to be the only important or significant topic on Tuesday's agenda. It may seem like a boring subject, but represents an opportunity for the public to hear a fresh analysis of the town's financial management strengths and weaknesses. A previous post offers my own assessment of the twenty-three items to which our auditor called particular attention.

One thing to bear in mind is that the auditing contract is not just a bilateral agreement between the town and the auditor. The North Carolina Local Government Commission (LGC) is also a party, in that the contract must be submitted to the LGC Secretary for approval. The LGC must also approve the audit, including completion of required corrections, before they will approve final invoices for payment. LGC provides a form for the contract and prescribes procedures for the audit.

This year, the LGC sent the Town of Oriental at least three letters complaining about the audit by Seiler, Zachman & Associates, PA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. Two of those letters complained the report was late and asked for the town's plan to correct this. The third letter identified five deficiencies requiring correction, including two items that had to be corrected before LGC would approve the final invoice. Of the five items, two related to the Water Fund.

In addition, almost four months after the end of the fiscal year, the auditing firm forwarded to the Town of Oriental five pages of "Adjusting Journal Entries." The adjustments included a credit for $3,503.48 annotated "Adjust cash to reconciled balance." Apparently this was to account for an unexplained discrepancy in cash on hand as of the date of the audit.

Whitewash Defined

Definitions of whitewash on the Web: (see "Audit III")

• cover up a misdemeanor, fault, or error; "Let's not whitewash the crimes of Stalin"; "She tried to gloss over her mistakes"
• a defeat in which the losing person or team fails to score
• cover with whitewash; "whitewash walls"
• wash consisting of lime and size in water; used for whitening walls and other surfaces
• exonerate by means of a perfunctory investigation or through biased presentation of data
• a specious or deceptive clearing that attempts to gloss over failings and defects
  wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Health Care

I was born in an Osteopathic hospital in 1937. At the time, it was the least expensive option available; an important consideration for working class parents during the Great Depression.

During more than seven decades since then, I have received medical care through most of the possible program structures:
a: No insurance - just pay the doctor;
b: Provided directly by the government - in my case, at military treatment facilities;
c: Provided by employer through private health insurance;
d: Single payer government paid health insurance - CHAMPUS, TRICARE, MEDICARE.

The only possible program I have never participated in is private purchase of private health insurance. One of our sons has done that.

It is great that both houses of Congress have passed health care reform bills. May they be quickly reconciled. We owe it to ourselves and our posterity to provide universal health care benefits. We are the only advanced country that doesn't.

Universal health care systems in other countries all result in better health outcomes at lower cost to society. I would have preferred either a straight system of government health care like that in Great Britain and the United States Veteran's Administration or a single-payer system like Medicare. But something is better than nothing. Once we get a system in place, we can make it better.

Next we need a real public option.